"Equity-free" is the most misused phrase in accelerator marketing. Plenty of programs describe themselves that way while still taking a slice of your company, and plenty of directory listings — including filters that let you slide equity down to zero — quietly record an undisclosed percentage as 0%. Of the 60 programs in FindSeed, seven are genuinely non-dilutive. This is that list, what each one actually hands over, and what it costs you in ways that are not measured in equity.
The seven programs that take no equity
| Program | What you get | Cash or credits | Stage | Where |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43North | Up to $1M, no equity | Cash | Pre-seed → Seed | Buffalo, NY (in person) |
| Thiel Fellowship | $200K grant to build instead of finishing college | Cash | Idea → Pre-seed | Remote / SF |
| MedTech Innovator | Up to $500K in prizes for medtech and healthtech | Prizes | Seed | Remote |
| Hub71 | $68K+ cash, plus housing and office space | Cash + in kind | Pre-seed → Seed | Abu Dhabi (in person) |
| MassChallenge | Zero-equity accelerator with cash prizes at the end | Prizes | Pre-seed → Seed | Boston (hybrid) |
| Google for Startups Accelerator | $200K+ in cloud credits and Google mentorship | Credits | Seed | Global (hybrid) |
| NVIDIA Inception | GPU credits, training and investor introductions | Credits | Idea → Seed | Global (remote) |
Read that "cash or credits" column carefully, because it is where most founders misread this category. Only three of the seven put guaranteed money in your bank account. Two award prizes, which means you may finish the programme with nothing. Two give credits, which are genuinely valuable if you are burning money on GPUs or cloud and worth nothing at all if you are not.
The three that actually pay you
43North is the largest non-dilutive cheque on the list: up to $1M, no equity taken. The trade is geography. It runs in person in Buffalo, New York, and the programme is built around companies being there — which is the point of a programme funded to bring startups to the city.
Thiel Fellowship is the most selective and the most specific: $200K to people who stop out of college to build. It is a bet on the founder rather than the company, and if you are already past that stage of life it is not for you.
Hub71 is the quiet answer to the question founders actually ask, which is usually some version of "is there a programme that pays me and houses me?" Abu Dhabi's government-backed hub offers $68K and up alongside housing and office space. Again, you go there — it is an in-person programme and the support exists to build a local ecosystem.
If you also need somewhere to live
Of the seven, only Hub71 combines no equity with accommodation. It is worth knowing that the best-known residencies do not: HF0 (Hacker Fellowship Zero) runs a monastic twelve-week residency for repeat technical founders and takes a SAFE, and The Residency (Founders Inc.) is an equity deal. Housing is expensive to provide, and programmes that provide it usually want something back. That is not a criticism — it is just the trade, and it should be a conscious one.
What "no equity" quietly costs
Relocation. Four of the seven are in-person or hybrid in a specific city. Moving yourself, and possibly a team, for three months is a real cost that never appears in the programme's marketing.
Time, at the worst possible moment. Accelerator programming is demanding by design. Workshops, mentor sessions and demo-day preparation take the hours you would otherwise spend building or selling. A grant that consumes a quarter of your year is not free.
Prizes are not funding. Both prize-based programmes here are competitive. Plan as though you will not win, and treat anything you do win as upside.
Credits are only money if you were going to spend it. $200K of cloud credit is transformative for an AI company training models and close to irrelevant for a two-person SaaS whose infrastructure bill is a few hundred dollars a month.
Reporting and milestones. Grant money frequently comes with obligations — progress reports, local incorporation, hiring or presence requirements. Read the agreement for what you must do, not just what you will receive.
When taking equity is the better deal
Non-dilutive is not automatically superior. Y Combinator takes 7% and is, for many companies, still the highest-expected-value decision available, because the network and the signal change what you can raise next. The question is not "how much equity does this cost" in isolation. It is whether what the programme adds is worth more than the slice it takes.
A reasonable rule: if you are pre-product and the programme is mostly curriculum, non-dilutive is the better trade — you are not getting much that is worth 7%. If you are about to raise and the programme's network materially changes who takes your call, the dilutive one often pays for itself. Our equity benchmarks guide has the numbers for what is normal, and deal terms decoded explains what you are actually signing.
How to check any programme in ten seconds
Find the deal type before you find the equity number. Every program page in FindSeed shows it, and where a percentage is unpublished we say so rather than printing a zero. If a list elsewhere shows you a long column of 0% accelerators, assume most of them are undisclosed rather than free, and verify against the programme's own terms before you apply.
Ready to compare the rest? Browse all 60 programs, or start with how to choose a programme.
Find the right program for your startup
Filter 60 accelerators, studios and fellowships by equity, check size, stage, focus and format.
Browse the directory →